🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a disagreement between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated discussion over their fate often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to end their lives unless the federal government funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer discovered first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a job that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“Eve chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which advocates say reflects the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but in the past stated: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and around the clock care than any human in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park suspected particulars of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was released shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In late September, the nation’s government official denied a bid to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing situation in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As society, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a wider lack of awareness of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities work to find a solution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has proven highly debated. The planned facility, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the idea of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the coming months.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|